Teaching to the negative space

Nice piece, Jason. Often our students will make enough mistakes for us to “capitalize” on the ‘negative space’. Really it’s a good reminder of the value of mistakes.

The Number Warrior

I’ve been troubled ever since David Cox asked why students needed to learn the names of the algebraic properties (associative, identity, and so forth). Certainly I see misunderstandings: students confronted with

$latex (3 + x) + 2$

not aware they can combine the 3 and 2 with associative and commutative properties, or the classic

$latex frac{x+2}{x}$

leading the student to cancel the x terms rather than consider the distributive property. (*)

Clearly these things are being taught, but what’s going awry when they are used in practice? And why do students learn the names of these things?

It struck me that students only get taught the definition in a positive sense, memorizing (for example) that

$latex a + b = b + a$

and identifying 2 + 4 = 4 + 2 or (2 + x) + 3 = 3 + (2 + x) as the commutative property, and leaving…

View original post 260 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s